In
November 1999, before the release of Long Night's Journey into Day,
journalist and filmmaker Donna Carter caught up with Frances Reid and
Deborah Hoffmann for an informal chat about the film.
Tell
us a little about who you are and what you do.
Why
do most of your films have to do with social change and social issues?
Why
did you choose this topic - the Truth and Reconciliation Commission?
When
you look at this idea of truth and reconciliation, what do you see as
the most important impetus for telling this story? What is the historic
import of this story?
Did
making this film, sitting through the hearings over in South Africa,
listening to the stories, did it take a personal toll?
A
person can make social issues films, but how much is that really a catalyst
to inspire others to actually do anything?
How
were you received as two, Caucasian, female Americans?
What
was it like collaborating on this project?
Which
of the hearings affected you most? Which is the story you just can't
shake?
Anything
you would like to add?
Tell
us a little about who you are and what you do.
Frances:
I'm a documentary filmmaker. I've been making documentary films for
almost 30 years and also doing documentary cinematography, especially
during the 80s. The past 9 years now I've been mostly producing and
directing documentaries about social change, social issue-type documentaries.
Deborah:
I've actually mostly worked as a documentary editor the past 20 years.
I directed my first film [Complaints
of a Dutiful Daughter] six years ago, a personal film about
my mother. So this is the first film of this sort that I've also been
one of the director's on.
Top of Page
Why
do most of your films have to do with social change and social issues?
Frances:
I think it goes back to when I first started making films. As someone
who had been involved in the antiwar movement, the civil rights movement,
the women's movement, the gay rights movement, it made sense to me that
I brought all of my politics to my filmmaking, and, for me, filmmaking
seemed like a really wonderful tool for communicating what I wanted
to communicate to the world.
I think sometimes we can overrate the power of film, but I have seen
films I have made have an effect on people's lives, people's attitudes,
their perceptions of things, so that is very exciting.
Top of Page
Why
did you choose this topic - the Truth and Reconciliation Commission?
Deborah: We
first heard about the TRC one rainy day driving in the car. It was on
NPR, one of those situations where you can't get out of the car because
you have to keep listening to the radio. We were hearing about the hearing
happening in South Africa, just horrible gory details. These gory stories
were being told, and the country of South Africa was talking about reconciliation.

It just blew my mind the idea that first of all a whole country would
agree to uncover its past, as opposed to cover up its past, and then
would agree to discuss, on a national level; How would we heal and move
on?
I think for me in particular, because I'm a person who does hold a grudge
and does not forgive people, I found it a very challenging idea.
So first we heard the thing on NPR and then it was months later we were
eating breakfast and were reading in the NY Times another story about
the TRC. I really had the feeling "God! In my lifetime this is the most
exciting international thing that I've been alive for." And I foolishly
said to Frances, "I hope somebody's making a film about this."
There was this horrible silence. I looked up and I saw her face. Oh
God! Obviously, she was thinking, "Why not us?"
Frances: I should interject that the first films I ever made
were in Africa in the early '70's. Then, I did another film in Africa
in the early '90s on AIDS. I had never been back to South Africa after
'91, after the ANC was unbanned. So, it was a combination of us believing
this was a monumentally important thing that was happening, and it was
also my way of bringing a lot of things of interest of mine together.
Top of Page
When
you look at this idea of truth and reconciliation, what do you see as
the most important impetus for telling this story? What is the historic
import of this story?
Frances:
There have been a lot of truth commissions around the world in relation
to human rights abuses. I think this is the first time there has been
a real commitment to the truth.
A lot of the other ones have been sort of doing blanket amnesty, for
instance, where there really is no individual accountability. What excited
me about what they were doing in South Africa was that there was individual
accountability. But that didn't mean individuals were going to be prosecuted
or there was going to be retribution against individuals, but that individuals
had to account for what they had done and come forward and say, "Yes.
I did this thing," and give the details of what they did. And those
details, otherwise, would have been buried forever.
You look at the Nuremberg Trials where you have Nazi after Nazi coming
up and not accepting any blame for what they did. Suddenly, in South
Africa, you have people coming forward and saying, "I did do these things."
I think that has been a really important first step to healing. I think
that is something that can be so applicable to so many situations around
the world, not only on an international scale but even on an interpersonal
scale. In terms of, like this country, looking at slavery and looking
at the way that native Americans were decimated to sort of use something
like they have done in South Africa as a model, I think would be really
healthy and healing for this country.
Top
of Page
Did
making this film, sitting through the hearings over in South Africa,
listening to the stories, did it take a personal toll?
Deborah: I
think it did. Initially we sort of thought, here we are these Americans
coming from the outside. We sort of questioned ourselves. Do we have
the right to do this? Is this really okay? And then, I think we realized
we're probably better-equipped to do this than anybody.
All the people there who were covering this were, literally, having
nervous breakdowns. It was so intense, so unrelentingly awful; and it
went on and on and on. We got to go there seven or eight times. Then,
we got to come home and refuel and clear our heads before we went back.
I think it took a huge emotional toll, it would on anybody, to be hearing
these stories of what people can do to each other. But I think we have
the luxury of being able to come home and put a distance between ourselves
and it, and not have to walk down the street and think, "Oh, right.
The killer of my father is still out there." We didn't have to face
what it means personally for people to get amnesty.
Frances: I think it really helped that there were two of us so
we could decompress and debrief at the end of the day. The one time
I went myself it was in the midst of a very intense hearing. The stories
were of such intense betrayal on the part of the police of these young
kids. By the middle of the week I was starting to have my nervous breakdown
too. It really was hard to hear that day-after-day.
Top
of Page
A person can make social issues films, but how much
is that really a catalyst to inspire others to actually do anything?
Frances:
Maybe I can answer by way of a story. We took the film to the independent
feature market in New York in September. We were very nervous. It was
the first time we were showing it publicly, and it was just a rough
cut.
This was a screening where you have festival programmers and distributors
and broadcasters and people who tend to come in and be pretty hard-
boiled when they're sitting and watching something and leaving after
10 minutes. You just kind of get used to that.
Well, after the screening, there were all of these industry types standing
around in the lobby talking about the meaning of forgiveness and would
they be able to themselves personally do what people were doing in South
Africa, and how would they feel if their child had been killed.
It blew our minds, that this was the conversation that these folks were
having. They weren't talking about, "Well, I don't know if we can distribute
this film or not." It was completely about the content of the film.
I mean, if we could reach that crowd, I felt like we were in
pretty good shape.
For me that is the hope for the film, that it will inspire that kind
of dialogue. We just showed it the other night to our board of directors
and one of our members, who is African American, talked about the scene
at the end of the film with the black policeman and the mothers. She
said that scene would be so good for black policemen in this country
to see because of the kind of conflict they sometimes feel about policing
in their own communities. She was all ready to take it out and find
ways to use it specifically in that context.
I think within each one of those stories there is a lot of grist for
people's mills. That is what we hope for. I would love to even get it
beyond the talking about it. I'm not sort of audacious enough to think
this film will make the difference, but I would love to feel like the
process of the TRC and people learning about the process of the TRC
might get people in this country thinking, "We could really use something
like that here."
Coretta Scott King talked about wanting to do that in relationship to
(Martin Luther) King's assassination. She said it's not so much about
finding and prosecuting anybody else who might have been involved in
his death, but we just want to know. That truth would be really helpful
and healing for this country. I would just love to see some of that
over here.
Deborah: A number of the commissioners have been asked to go
to Northern Ireland and Bosnia, the Middle East and have actually been
going around consulting with other places about how to possibly set
up something like this. We're not public people like that, but hopefully
the film could be an ambassador to other parts of the world that are
trying to figure out how to heal and move on.
Top of Page
How
were you received as two, Caucasian, female Americans?
Deborah:
We were welcomed with open arms. The only place where we weren't completely
welcome was with some of the Afrikaners . . . They were suspicious.
But in terms of any activists of any color, any government (types) or
commissioners or any people involved in the truth commission, it was
astonishing the access we had and the way we were treated.
Frances:
Also the victims the mothers and widows and sufferers, they were incredibly
open with us and wonderful. We went there not necessary expecting that.
I went there very much with the trepidation of two white American girls,
who do we think we are?
We've made very many close friends there, but the first friend we made
was this white South African filmmaker, and she challenged us on that
right away. She said, "If you are going to come here and make a
film on this subject, you owe it to this country to bring this film
back here. So many journalists just come here and do their thing here,
and then they leave with it. It would be very valuable to the people
of this country to see your perspective as outsiders on this process."
And so, from the very beginning, because of her challenge, we made that
commitment that we would bring the film back to South Africa.
This last trip I was just on, I showed the film to this filmmaker and
one of the commissioners who has been very supportive of us from the
beginning. Glenda (Wildschut), who was the commissioner, said to me,
"I didn't think it was possible for somebody who is not a South African
to make the film that you've made."
Top of Page
What
was it like collaborating on this project?
Deborah:
(laughter) What is this, air the dirty laundry time?
Frances:
(laughter) It's the best and the worst. It's been a wonderful collaboration.
I feel like we complement each other really well in terms of our sensibilities
and work styles. Of Course, sometimes it's very hard. It is hard to
be life partners and also be making a film together because you inevitably
at some point hate the person that you're working with and if that person
is also whom you are living with . . . .
Deborah: You have no one to complain to. You can't say, "You
won't believe what the jerk there at the office did to me."
Frances:
That's the downside. There are a lot of documentary filmmaking couples
in the Bay area, and I don't think we're necessarily one of them. We
took this on as a particular film we wanted to make together. That doesn't
mean we want to go on making films together for the rest of our lives.
I mean, who knows. But right now . . . .
Deborah: We don't want to ever make another film as long as we
live anyhow.
Top of Page
Which
of the hearings affected you most? Which is the story you just can't
shake?
Deborah:
What affected me most was not the stories I heard (I mean every one
of them was something you couldn't' shake), but it was the understanding
- and maybe this is the most obvious thing in the world, but it took
me halfway through my life to get it - that the course of the world
and history really is made by just ordinary people like myself. I never
really understood that before.
Meeting just these wonderful, and terrible people, and meeting these
commissioners and meeting these perpetrators and realizing they were
just, at each extreme, they really were just regular people. At a certain
point they either made the decision to be incredibly weak and stupid,
or they made the decision to be incredibly committed, and they made
a difference.
I just came away being incredibly inspired and I realized that we all
have a lot more power in the course of the world than I understood before.
Top of Page
Anything
you would like to add?
Frances:
The only thing I would add to that is I think what made the TRC work,
and there are a lot of flaws to the TRC, but the thing that immediately
astonished us when we went there was the level of transparency they
were committed to.
The very first time we walked in that office and we said we want to
talk to so-and-so and so-and-so, they said, "Oh fine. When?" It felt
so different than if you went to Washington DC and you wanted to talk
to an official about something, and what you would have to cut through,
and then, when you talked to that official, the sort of bullshit you
would hear, the party line you would hear. There was no party line that
we heard, which is not to say the TRC didn't have one, but when it came
time to asking a question, we got an honest response.
There was this culture within the TRC of openness and transparency because
they knew that was the only way the process was going to work, and that's
what they wanted to model for the whole country.
Top
of Page
Stories
| News & Reviews |
Filmmakers Q& A
Production Credits | Sneak
Previews | History
Funding
| Contact | Home
Iris
Films Home